Followers

Showing posts with label King George III. Show all posts
Showing posts with label King George III. Show all posts

Sunday, January 26, 2014

The Birthday Present

Celebrating Washington's Birthday


Birthday Boy and Commander-in-Chief



King George III

Believe it or not, there was a time when George Washington's birthday was not a celebrated federal holiday. Wait a minute, that time would be... now! In this blogger's humble opinion, His Excellency is more than worthy of a day for him alone and not shared with 40-something other chief executives. He was the first.  And the first is always (OK, usually) special. But Washington was more than special. He was the essential man of his age. With the exception perhaps of King George III and his inner circle, that was the considered opinion of most of the world (America and Europe). Later, even George III had some lauding comments on Washington eschewing absolute power and kingship. In 1879, the US Congress honored our first president by closing government offices in Washington, DC, on  February 22nd. Curiously, this had nothing to do with the budget. It was the first holiday honoring a particular American citizen, and it was celebrated on his actual birthday, not the Monday of. Back then, the holidays were about commemorating something meaningful, not just another 3 day weekend. In 1885, Congress expanded the holiday to include all federal offices and activities.



A Special Birthday Present


In 1931, the Chief of Staff of the Army, Douglas MacArthur, submitted a recommendation to Congress intended to present the first commander-in-chief with a very special 200th birthday present: the awarding of a "new" medal to recognize soldiers injured in combat. On February 22, 1932, Washington's 200th birthday, the U.S. War Department announced the creation of the "Order of the Purple Heart." 

General Order No.3 announced the establishment of the award, which would have a likeness of Washington:

"...By order of the President of the United States, the Purple Heart, established by General George Washington at Newburgh, August 7, 1782, during the War of the Revolution, is hereby revived out of respect to his memory and military achievements."

By order of the Secretary of War:

Douglas MacArthur

General, Chief of Staff


But why was this so special after all? 


 The First Award


Biographers and students of George Washington know that he is the author of many firsts, both in the military and later in the presidential and political arena. The sobriquet, First in War, First in Peace, First in the hearts... was literally true. This was the logical result of Washington's place and time in our nation's founding and the leadership he showed through eight years of war, the establishment of the US Constitution, and eight years of the world's first presidency. The list of things established by him in the military, civil and governmental spheres is impressive. One of these firsts is the nation's first military award. The award, originally called the Badge of
Washington's Headquarters, Newburgh, NY
Military Merit was established by Washington when he served as the commander-in-chief of the Continental Army as the long war for independence was coming to a close. That order, issued from his headquarters at Newburgh, New York, stated it would be a decoration consisting of a purple, heart-shaped piece of silk, edged with a narrow binding of silver, with the word Merit stitched across the face in silver. The badge was to be presented to soldiers for "any singularly meritorious action" and permitted its wearer to pass guards and sentinels without challenge! I like that last perk. Does cutting the line at TSA count?


On August 7, 1782, this general order established the Badge of Military Merit:

"... The General ever desirous to cherish virtuous ambition in his soldiers, as well as to foster and encourage every species of military merit directs whenever any singularly meritorious action is performed, the author of it shall be permitted to wear on his facings, over his left breast, the figure of a heart in purple cloth or silk edged with narrow lace or binding."

Original Badge of Merit Replica


The honoree's name and regiment were also to be inscribed in a "Book of Merit." As it turns out, only three Revolutionary War soldiers are known to have received the Badge of Military Merit: Sergeant Elijah Churchill, 2nd Continental Dragoons; Sergeant William Brown, 5th and Sergeant Daniel Bissel, 2nd Connecticut Continental Line Infantry. Possible Yankee Doodle Spies connection: 2nd Continental Dragoons included Lieutenant Colonel Benjamin Tallmadge's unit - Washington's spies. Unknown if Sergeant Churchill was a member of that element, but it is likely.




The Legacy


It did not take long for the Purple Heart to evolve in scope and purpose. On May 28, 1932, 138 World War I veterans were conferred their Purple Hearts at Temple Hill in New Windsor, NY. Temple Hill was the site of the New Windsor Cantonment, which was the final encampment of the Continental Army in the winter of 1782-1783. At first, the Purple Heart was exclusively awarded to Army and Army Air Corps personnel. Still, in 1942, President Franklin Roosevelt allowed the Navy to award the Purple Heart to Sailors, Marines, and Coast Guard personnel. Later that year, the Purple Heart was made available for posthumous award to any member of the military killed on or after December 7, 1941. The original Purple Heart was awarded for meritorious service. But with the creation of the Legion of Merit in 1942, the award of the Purple Heart for meritorious service was discontinued and is now awarded to any member of the Armed Forces who has been wounded or killed in designated combat activities.

Today's Purple Heart


Saturday, April 13, 2013

The Tax Man and the Revolution

This week heralds our federal income tax deadline - a time that fills most Americans with dread. And no wonder. Our nation was founded by men who resisted unjust taxes. The American Revolution was precipitated, in part, by a series of laws passed between 1763 and 1775 that regulated trade and taxes. These laws caused tensions between colonists and British officials. British unwillingness to respond to American demands for change allowed colonists to argue that they were part of an increasingly corrupt and autocratic empire in which their traditional liberties were threatened. This position eventually served as the basis for the colonial Declaration of Independence.

The Declaration of Independence was the result
of years of political turmoil and outright rebellion


After 1763, the British government emerged from the Seven Years' War (known in America as the French and Indian War) burdened by heavy debts. This led British Prime Minister George Grenville to reduce duties on sugar and molasses while enforcing the law more strictly. The colonial governments of New York and Massachusetts sent formal letters of protest to Parliament.


George Grenville


 

To ensure that the colonies did not try to pay for goods and their taxes in local currency, the British Parliament passed the 1764 Currency Act, which forbade the colonies from issuing paper currency. This made it even more difficult for colonists to pay their debts and taxes.

 

Following the Currency Act, Grenville proposed a Stamp Tax. This law would require colonists to purchase a government-issued stamp for legal documents and other paper goods. In effect, it was an indirect tax on many things colonists needed to conduct day-to-day business. Grenville submitted the bill to Parliament for debate, and only one member objected to Parliament's right to tax the colonies.

 

In response, the Virginia House of Burgesses passed resolutions denying the British Parliament's authority to tax the colonies. In Boston, tensions escalated. Colonists rioted and destroyed the house of the stamp distributor. News of these protests inspired similar actions in other colonies, and thus the Stamp Act served as a common cause that united the 13 colonies in opposition to the British Parliament. In October of 1765, delegates from 9 colonies met to issue petitions to the British government denying Parliament's authority to tax the colonies. An American boycott of British goods, coupled with a recession, also led British merchants to lobby for the act's repeal on pragmatic economic grounds. Under pressure from American colonists and British merchants, the British government decided it was easier to repeal the Stamp Act than to enforce it.


The Boston Tea Party

The repeal of the Stamp Act temporarily quieted colonial protest, but resistance to new taxes imposed in 1767 under the Townshend Acts soon returned. Tensions escalated as disgruntled colonists organized. In 1773, colonists staged more vocal, widespread protests after the British Parliament granted the East India Company a monopoly on the tax-free transport of tea. The tax-free status of the British East India Company meant that colonial tea traders could not compete. Enraged colonists responded by encouraging a general boycott of British goods. On December 16, 1773, American colonists disguised as Indians boarded East India Company ships in Boston Harbor and threw crates of tea overboard. This famous protest became known as the Boston Tea Party.

 

When news of the Tea Party reached England, British officials moved to enforce discipline and order in the colonies. The British government ordered the closure of the port of Boston until the East India Company was compensated for the destroyed tea. Parliament also passed several pieces of legislation in 1774, which Americans termed the Intolerable Acts. British control was further solidified by the appointment of General Thomas Gage as the military governor of Massachusetts. He attempted to place Massachusetts under direct British control. 


By 1774, most colonists agreed that a meeting to discuss an appropriate collective response to British actions was a good idea. Colonial legislatures sent representatives to Philadelphia, and the First Continental Congress convened in September 1774. The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Association on October 20. These Articles listed colonial grievances and called for a locally enforced boycott across all the colonies, effective December 1. The delegates also drafted a petition to King George III outlining their grievances, although by then they doubted the crisis would be resolved peacefully.

King George III

Recognizing that further coercive measures would only enrage the colonists and might lead to war, British military governor Gage wrote to London, recommending the suspension of the Intolerable Acts. Gage hoped to appease many colonists and thereby split colonial moderates from radicals. If London was not amenable to his recommendations, Gage stated that he would need significant reinforcements to crush the growing rebellion.


General Thomas Gage

As a reward for his suggestions, Gage was ordered to be removed from his post. The British government felt that further punitive measures were necessary, so Parliament passed additional trade restrictions on New England. London declared the colonies in rebellion, but to split the resistance, it also offered to stop taxing those colonies that supported the British government.


Lexington

By this time, the most astute leaders on both sides viewed armed conflict as inevitable. Gage's attempts to secure his position in Boston only brought him into conflict with local militias and a hostile populace, and it was only a matter of time before open war broke out in 1775. The opportunity for peaceful negotiation had ended, and the war for American Independence began on April 19, 1775, when British troops and American colonists clashed at Lexington and Concord.


Concord

Later this week (after our taxes are paid), we will celebrate the anniversary of the battles at Lexington and Concord...the shot heard round the world...